No argument on stochastic terrorism, but for this one guy... he seems to be motivated to help Ukraine - and we on the D side have been very clear on what trump becoming president means for Ukraine in terms of witholding support. Giving that man (and his 2025 hangers-on) power would be a disaster in many ways, but particularly for Ukraine.
I'm doing as much as I can bring myself to do to prevent this disaster - but in terms of donating money and time. This person they're calling a potential assassin clearly has much different boundaries than I do.
But is telling the truth (about what can happen to US support for Ukraine) the same kind of incitement as telling lies about Haitains - or child abuse? They feel quite different to me but I have no strong argument as to why one is OK and the other is not.
Anyone?