If you read Alito's draft opinion you'll see that he thinks a woman's right had ought to be decided by legislators. I don't 100% disagree. We really need a law - or a Constitutional Amendment. Either way, the focus should now be on state governments, particularly the ones that don't already have pro-choice laws in place.

Back in 2016, I my state had no pro-choice law. When I brought the issue up with my state senator he told me "we're working on it - it stalled out right after Roe got decided". It got passed as of a couple of years ago (MA is like the fed gov't: house, senate, then governor signs).

Check your state senator and reps. They're supposed to represent you. Make sure they know what you want. If they don't, support the opposition, bring it up with local merchants who might be supporting the one you want out. Knock doors for and donate money to the ones who actually represent you.

Yes, things'll be bad, but there's no way laws would get passed in the neutral states if there wasn't at least the threat of Roe getting overturned. This opinion, even if it loses a majority in the SC, makes the importance of state laws obvious.